mepeace.org - network for peace

I attended '' Peace Education Workshop " this weekend in Beit Jalla. The workshop started when Gershon Baskin asked a big question: How to end occupation and help make peace?. Gershon told the participants to think about practical ideas and projects as the workshop aimed to move from words to actions. Sadly, the workshop ended and the big question still needs to be answered. So I introduce the same question to let peacemakers in this website think and discuss it.

Views: 0

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I am sorry to say it, but Israel needs pressure from the outside to change just as South Africa needed pressure, and that includes pressure from North American Jews. South Africa, Israel's major ally, wouldn't have changed so quickly if it didn't feel both internal and external pressure to do so. Israel has talked about eating the Gaza blockade, which violates international law, after it violated international law by attacking people clearly in international waters. After the outcry by the European Union over the attack against Greeks, Turks and others Israel reacted to the pressure. Do I really think Israel's leaders will simply do the right thing and remove settlements, sign a peace agreement for two states with Jerusalem as their capital to show good-will. Not a chance without pressure. That's my answer. Many (not all) Israelis complain that they are held to another standard. Can't Iran say the same thing. Iran doesn't even nuclear weapons, it hasn't killed so many people as Israel has in terms of civilians, but they face sanctions. To be fair, both Iran and Israel should have sanctions, not just Iran. Should Israel be held to the level of dictatorships or a democracy? South African whites could say they were held to a higher standard than Israelis including those who didn't want to end apartheid. Many whites didn't want to live with blacks. I don't mean this out of disrespect for my Israeli friends, but the Madrid Conference wouldn't have happened without Bush senior pressuring the Shamir government. It would be nice if Shamir did the right without any pressure. It makes me sad to think of the prospect of more economic pressure from the Western public and consumers, because I value the Israelis that I know.

http://wire.antiwar.com/2010/06/18/elton-john-aside-israelis-feel-g...

If England felt no pressure from the Indian boycotts in India and the strikes, England would have stayed in India. The world must protest the occupation economically and politically.
so much hate Basil so much hate . how do want to have peace with Israelis ?.
maybe write another ten times south Africa and the peace will come .
the solution for Israel will not be like south Africa the world is in consensus about a two state solution . that means that we need a Palestinian state at least as a first stage next to Israel .
that means that we need a Palestinian united Gov.
I agree with you, Basil, that a pressure is needed. That is how it had been worked with others, as you have suggested.

But, it is not good enough, there is an urgent need for an assimilation of the peace idea and it's meaning in the people's heart and mind. People are afraid of the idea of peace, out of ignorance and lack of trust, out of the wrong education about the other side, out of indifference which is a result of all the above.

Waleed, the workshop indeed had ended with the "big question" un-answered, but I feel after every time I participated the workshop wiser, and more hopeful, and with much stronger belief peace is going to be happened. Just, it will take more time, dear time, and we must hope - not too long time.

Thank you for posting this here - I think this is the right place for a brainstorming.
Israel can not withdraw form the west bank with out agreement. ending the occupation will have to be in agreement BTW the Palestinian and the "world", mostly US. declaration of independence of Palestine. and then with pressure from the world it could work.
just pressuring Israel with out giving a solution will lead us to war
"Israel can not withdraw form the west bank with out agreement."

++++ Yes it can, but doing so, nothing has been solved.

"ending the occupation will have to be in agreement BTW the Palestinian and the "world","

++++ Noooo, it has to be agreement between Israel and palestinians, after that will world follow.

" mostly US. declaration of independence of Palestine."

++++ Mostly UN general assembly declaration.
Mika at the moment there is no united Palestinians gov, and fatah is against direct talks with us, so how are we going to have an agreement between Israel and Palestine? we need a broker in the middle .
other then that I agree with you
No need to be "united government". If hamas is in government, Israel would say most likely that dont talk with those guys anyway. And fatah, well, we know what is fatah stance. Settlements freeze, total. And because no freeze, no direct talks.

And indeed, broker is needed, but someone else than US. First, they are not honest, and they cant be broker in this Israel/palestine situation today.

We need USA in negotiation table, but when it is there, they cant be objective to any direction. Dilemma really. If US starts to but some pressure to Israel, Israel lobby pulls brakes in domestic field in USA, and thats the end of that. And pressure needs to put to both sides, but whose gonna be able to do so ? Do we need a new player in the field, who can work in similar terms with both sides.
Mika but you see again I partly agree.
if there is a deferent gov in Gaza and the west bank then it is a problem.

other then the US and Maybe Germany I doubt that is another third party that is powerful enough and will be fair to Israel , so it has to be the US .

now there is a settlement freeze it maybe not 100% but every include the Palestinians knows that its an impossible demand
"if there is a deferent gov in Gaza and the west bank then it is a problem."

++++ Only problem which i see really is how someone from outside doesnt recognize completely democratic election results in 2006. And thats the problem. When was hamas given really opportunity what election won give to them.

Fair to Israel ? Fair to both. And pressure to both. And US cant do that job.

Settlement freeze 100% impossible ? No at all. We all know that it will end anyway.

Or we must then do conclusion that Israel (government ), is not interested of peace at all. But settlement enterprise they are. So, conflict continues on and on.
mika I am fine with what ever gov the Palestinians wants to have as long as both the people in the west bank and Gaza agree on it. and this gov and willing to make peace with Israel .

++ I am saying fair to Israel BC if its not the US or again maybe Germany it will not be a gov that is fair to Israel. so it will not be fair to both. the US is the only one that is fair to both and has enough influence in the region to promote peace, .

100% settlement freeze in a place with living people are impossible unless you want to see a war in Israel or unless again Israel is withdrawing from the west bank in a one sided move
Norway ? Did splendid job in Oslo negotiations.

US "has enough influence in the region to promote peace"....LOL

Yeah, they really LOVE USA in the middle east. And promoted they have, & i cant really count peace to be one of those things that US has promoted in the region.

"100% settlement freeze in a place with living people are impossible"

++++ Well, i dont know this field in ME and Israel so well, but where i live there are some city/county etc limitations of construction + coordination, where and how to construct buildings. You know yourself that its just excuse.


"unless you want to see a war in Israel"

++++ We are mostly talking of situation in OPT. Which includes east-Jerusalem. And settlers are ready to start war in Israel ? Good luck with that, now we know who are running Israel after all. So, we can then forget that peace between Israel and palestine.

After few years we might come to visit and see if anybody is still alive.

"or unless again Israel is withdrawing from the west bank in a one sided move"

++++ Nope, and doesnt belong to this issue.
Mika I will not argue with you first BC I do support 100% settlement freeze.

and I do what to see a peace talk Btw Israel and what sever gov the Palestinians wants.

and I agree with you on most things, at the moment it seems far away

RSS

Latest Activity

YTheater Project Jerusalem posted events
48 minutes ago
Maha Mehanna liked ICD's event The International Symposia on Cultural Diplomacy 2013
6 hours ago
Jane Young liked Waleed Hammad's discussion A Single Democratic State
6 hours ago
Carla Bach-Proehl and Clement Awanfe Ngueto are now friends
7 hours ago
Carla Bach-Proehl posted a status
"worth visiting..."
7 hours ago
Profile IconMEPEACE via Twitter
Share and enjoy today's recommendations on http://t.co/3UHCmZU7Qm:... http://t.co/OTjJCUC8YA
Twitter7 hours ago · Reply · Retweet
Profile IconMEPEACE via Twitter
Share and enjoy today's recommendations on http://t.co/3UHCmZU7Qm:... http://t.co/eMgLvPRJoH
Twitter7 hours ago · Reply · Retweet

Search mepeace.org

"Like" us on Facebook

Badge

Loading…

© 2013   Created by Eyal Raviv.

Feedback | Report an Issue  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service