A proposition to enhance our organization through networking around topics


I´ll share and detail a suggestion I´d made to MEPEACE organizers about the dynamics of our organization (BTW, that´s one type of contribution i feel comfortable with, because that´s my professional background).

The driver was the observation of low attendance to the biweekly chat of the volunteers group, in which I had the chance of participating.

My guess is that we can develop a number of small and tightly-knit subnetworks in which people evolve stronger ties based on their shared interest in some project(s) and/or topic(s).
The strategy would be:

  • we define a taxonomy of key topics and key projects.
  • the coordinators publish that in a page, so that everyone can choose their favorite topics, and start discussing until a group is created in this platform (groups have been underutilized, though it´s a powerful tool in Ning).
  • the people in each group will have constant interactions, so that it becomes natural to remind each other about the next events.
I´ll give a couple examples in which I am personally interested:
a topic: human rights. How to struggle for embetterment in the human rights record for all peoples in the region?
  • a project: World Social Forum (WSF) on Jan 25-29, 2012, in Porto Alegre, Brazil, with the central theme being Social and Environmental Justice. I´ll make a specific blog post on that.
  • threee subprojects: 
    • a roundtable on Water in the Middle East, within the World Social Forum on January
    • a continuation of that in the Rio+20 Conference on June
    • a conclusion of that regarding Israel-Palestine on the Special WSF about Palestine, on Nov´12, Sao Paulo.
I believe that such a topic-centric organization structure can provide the following outcomes:
  • a special place for each one to add his or her contributions according to their backgrounds, skills and locations
  • deeper discussions and outcomes for ME Peace
  • greater involvement of internationals in solution-seeking for I-P Peace.
  • a wider scope of issues that attracts people who will feel that they will make a difference, and enrich the dialogues with topics other than those where negation of the other is more likely to occur: frontiers, refugees, where dialogue gets is so much harder and frustrating. 
  • and also fun and gratification for everybody.
What do you think about this idea?
> Tks!!!

Views: 84

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This is valuable and important initiative !

Thanks for this Sergio.  Anything is worth a go.  The challenges are:


1. Despite the sales pitch mepeace has only a very small group of active members (at times you can count them on one hand).  

2. There is an extremely high turn over of new members.

3. The question is how to ensure the commitment of people in a hostile environment.  That is discussions are public and often get personal.  There is a spectrum of members.  Mepeace discussions are not as bad as youtube commentators where explicit offensive language is used at one another, but certainly discussions are frequently not based in a mutual feeling of constructive dialogue.

4.  Discussions take an enormous amount of time to be done well - eg research, editing and drafting text.


At one level I would suggest if we want to have more constructive dialogue then there be more strict membership rules and limit it to persons actively engaged in humanizing the plight of Palestinians, Jewish-Israelis and Palestinian-Israelis. My response against stricter membership rules is:  I know I personally learn a lot from engaging with persons who read the conflict differently.  The response to this is: such divergence in views may cut off new members to the site, who may initially join thinking there will be a more constructive and respectful dialogue. I have seen a lot of new people come and go.  Would they have stayed if they felt there voice would be shown greater respect, rather than being demonised by the other?


In terms of a taxonomy of discussion things that interest me are:


1. Sources of hope

2. Sources of conflict

3. Ways forward


Specific topics that interest me are:

1. History - understanding the origins of the conflict

- Ottoman rule, British rule (1917-1948), Israeli - Egyptian - Jordanian rule

- The role of the international community: League of Nations, United Nations, Arab League, World Zionist Congress


2. Current events - understanding obstacles to the conflict at present (and sources of hope)

Permanent Status issues: refugees, Jerusalem, borders, security, Israeli settlements

Other issues: Gaza blockade, human rights abuses, water, status of women, status of LGBT community, religious fundamentalism, autocratic governments


3. Conflict resolution, Peace theory and the Nonviolence movement

What can be learnt from Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, Johan Galtung, Gene Sharp, Aung Sun Suu Kyi and the like?  What can be learnt from civil society (eg ICRC, Amnesty International, World Social Forum and the like)?


I see it is as unavoidable (and necessary) for disagreement to occur in discussions.  It is only through such disagreement that we will all move (hopefully) to a better place in understanding. The challenge to find people who are willing to devote time to achieve an outcome that seeks to build a better life for the people of Israel and Palestine.




Also Sergio regarding 'Groups':


One reason 'Groups' are not as useful for me is the ning set up does not allow for editing of comments made (apart from deleting the whole comment). In contrast 'Discussion' sites (because of the editing option) allows greater flexibility.


I am much more cautious using a function if I don't have the option to delete it or amend it.

Hi Stewart

Thanks a lot for your comments.

I´ll advocate the use of Groups, using your own argument: it allows for discussions within the group.

So the advantages of discussions will not be lost, and at the same time we´ll be able to segregate discussion topics so that they don´t overload with emails the members who are not enlisted in a specific issue.

About the remainder of your points, I am in full agreement, and we may have each theme you suggested in the taxonomy in a different topic in the forum for those which may be related with a World Social Forum project. 

I´ll get into more detail in the coming days.


Bye and thank you again.




Latest Activity

izida duranovic updated their profile
Jan 9
Dr. David Leffler posted a blog post

Cruise Ships for Peace in The Middle East

By Teresa Studzinski, Arlene J. Schar, and Dr. David Leffler Variations of this article were…See More
Nov 6, 2019
Shefqet Avdush Emini updated their profile
Oct 29, 2019
Mauricio San Miguel Llosa updated their profile
Oct 4, 2019
Amir Salameh updated their profile
Jun 25, 2019
Fredda Goldfarb updated their profile
Apr 15, 2019
Dr. David Leffler posted a blog post
Apr 9, 2019


"Like" us on Facebook

Promote MEPEACE online



© 2020   Created by Eyal Raviv. Supported by One Region, One Future.   ..

Feedback | Report an Issue  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service