Stone-age ambition -- By Alan Howe (The Herald Sun -- 20 July 2009)

[Highlight: "The people of Gaza have a right to keep looking over their shoulder. That's where they are going." PmR]
Stone-age ambition
By Alan Howe
The Herald Sun
20 July 2009,21985,25805348-5000117,00....

The people of Gaza are set to be the first to bomb themselves back to the Stone Age. Serves them right.

Sympathetic news outlets last week ran reports on how "resourceful" Gazans were making simple homes out of mud and straw bricks using the rubble from destroyed buildings.

They had been forced to return to the rudimentary building techniques of previous millennia because of a shortage of materials due to the partial blockade imposed on Gaza by Israel.

The only difference is that their forefathers didn't have access to that much rubble.

Israelis created that rubble when they reluctantly launched Operation Cast Lead seven months ago to silence the endless bombing campaign against its southern cities, which reside so near the festering malevolence that is Gaza.

The rockets from Gaza are mostly aimed at Sderot, a town of 20,000 in the western Negev desert.

I hadn't been there when I wrote about it more than a year ago, reporting on the odd life of the resilient people who choose to live in the world's most bombed city.

The other day, with incoming quiet for a while, we drove around its streets and met some of the locals.

On most corners there are simple concrete bomb shelters, smaller versions of the ones in their schools where the shelters also serve as playgrounds, a prime Arab target, of course.

No one in Sderot drives around listening to CDs or the radio. They are permanently tuned to the possibility they'll hear a calm, disembodied woman's voice announcing "Tseva Adom" - Code Red. Because they have just seconds to get from their vehicle to a shelter, seat belts are never worn.

No one has a shower unless there is someone else in the house; no point in smelling like roses with a homemade missile about to reshape your roof. We saw a house hit by one of those Qassams. It could have been a modest 1930s tiled cottage in Coburg.

The missile had penetrated the roof and destroyed much of the house.

It was a lucky strike; built by angry Gazans who might in some quarters be described as "resourceful", it could have been propelled on its wonky path by oil, or petrol, maybe even sugar.

Almost a third of the people of Sderot are being treated for psychiatric illness.

Last year I wrote that "Gazans ... know that as many innocents as they can kill at the bus shelter today will be fewer than the casualties they suffer once Israel responds.

But that is inevitable when you keep poking sticks into the eyes of one of the world's sharpest armies. They aren't going to come at you with some jerry-built rockets knocked up in Uncle Ali's shed."

And they didn't. Getting precisely the response that many Gazans prayed for, Israel launched Operation Cast Lead late in December.

Hamas fighters, like their Hezbollah colleagues in Southern Lebanon, hid out in, fired from and operated around sensitive populated areas - and even a cemetery of Australian war dead - hoping to goad the Israeli army into an indiscriminate response.

The terrorist foot-soldiers may be uneducated and unworldly, but their bosses know a PR coup if they can set one up. Dead schoolkids? Great!

More than 1000 Palestinians died during the conflict, the most insightful moment of which was captured on film: a Hamas hero, trying to evade Israeli fire, picks up a small child by the scruff of the neck as "cover" as he runs from one side of the street to the other.

Things since have been a little quieter, but the lull ended on Friday when the first missile for a month weaved its irregular way from Gaza to Israel.

It landed harmlessly in a field near a kibbutz.

The problem for Gazans is that a survey after the Israeli action showed that almost half the population believed Hamas had won, that more than half believed acts of terror should continue, and there was a sharp rise in the number who wanted the rocket attacks to continue.

The people of Gaza have a right to keep looking over their shoulder. That's where they are going.

Views: 9

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Basil wrote "Paul, this article seems more like extreme propaganda to me"

How so?

I respectfully disagree. The only war Hamas could win was the Propaganda War. Is pointing that out EXTREME propaganda?

I see the two statements you've extracted as plain common sense facts.

I also have written many times here for the past 2 plus years that only logical reason Hamas had and has for the rockets they shot into Southern Isreal was to provoke a response from Israel and thus manufacture Palestinian Victims for propaganda purposes.

I see all that as self evident facts.

Are facts propaganda? Or worse, EXTREME propaganda?
Hi Basil,

He did not write or imply as you did [all] Gazans.

He wrote many Gazans.

I think that he should have written some Gazans.

Like the people of Iran, Gazans can have their say if they really disagaree with Hamas. I may just be be too naive though to think that. People from Gaza are and ca be here and can comment (anonymously)

Be well...
I agree Basil that no Jew or Arab deserves to be bombed.

After 8000 rockets from Gaza and defiantly ignoring warnings to desist and the increase in rockets from Gaza before Operation Castlead despite clear warning.... what do you really think Hamas could reasonably expect, Basil?

Or do you think that the Hamas leadership is mentally challenged?

Common sense?
Regarding collective guilt:

1) The German People were not collectively guilty for the acts of the Nazis
2) The Japanese people were not collectively guilty for the acts and adventures of the Japanese leadership in the 1930's an then in WWII.
3) The people of Gaza are not collectively guilty for the acts and adventures of their leadership.

But when that leadership persists in harming or threatening others....
Hi Basil,

For me it is this simple: No rockets ==> No invasion.

The rest could have been negotiated without violence unless vioence is one's objective. Without the rockets, the circustances of the people of Gaza would, in my view, not have been worse and probably would have been (much) better. Certainly, a lot more people would be alive.

From my perspective all you' ve done immediately above Basil is explain some of the circumstances. And by doing so, you've simply implicitly justified the 8000 rockets and the related and ensuing and resulting violence.

For me the essence is just that obvious and just that simple.
Basil wrote "Paul, this article seems more like extreme propaganda to me"

I respectfully disagree.

I also expect that Neri will now tell us that is an example of the blame game.



Latest Activity

izida duranovic updated their profile
Jan 9
Dr. David Leffler posted a blog post

Cruise Ships for Peace in The Middle East

By Teresa Studzinski, Arlene J. Schar, and Dr. David Leffler Variations of this article were…See More
Nov 6, 2019
Shefqet Avdush Emini updated their profile
Oct 29, 2019
Mauricio San Miguel Llosa updated their profile
Oct 4, 2019
Amir Salameh updated their profile
Jun 25, 2019
Fredda Goldfarb updated their profile
Apr 15, 2019
Dr. David Leffler posted a blog post
Apr 9, 2019


"Like" us on Facebook

Promote MEPEACE online



© 2020   Created by Eyal Raviv. Supported by One Region, One Future.   ..

Feedback | Report an Issue  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service