سميّة: الانتحارية المحظوظة
Niqash – Kholoud Ramzi (Baghdad) – 21 August 2008:

Sumaya will never forget the day when armed al-Qaeda men forced her to practice wearing an explosive vest under her clothes in preparation for a suicide attack on a local market she was supposed to carry out the following day.

Sumaya’s story began when her husband, Amjad al-Dulaimi, a former officer in the Iraqi army, joined al-Qaeda’s ranks after being recruited by former army colleagues. He had refused when first approached because he feared that his family would be targeted. But, “under financial pressure and with a lack of work opportunities” he was forced to join al-Qaeda, says his wife.

Amjad undertook many tasks such as planting explosive devices on roads, transporting small rockets, attacking army and police convoys and other similar tasks making use of his previous military experience. After less than one year, Amjad was surprised when al-Qaeda’s emir, responsible for his group, ordered the recruitment of women jihadis. Amjad and four other men in his group, brought their wives thinking that they would be required to perform “easy tasks” such as gathering information for fighters.

The next day, the emir arrived with a woman he introduced as a “sister in jihad.” Without revealing her real name, the women met with the five wives and after a half an hour meeting she emerged to tell the emir that she has chosen Amjad’s wife to implement a suicide attack.

Al-Qaeda offered Amjad $5000 in compensation to help him raise his three children. “I still recall those moments when the emir started thanking God and congratulating me for the choice of my wife to become the martyr. I recalled the years I spent in the army away from my family and the hardships Sumaya suffered providing for the family needs. I recalled all these memories while the emir was telling me to recite the Quran as many times as possible and to prepare my wife for the attack.”

“This was a crucial test after which I decided to walk away,” says Amjad. It only took him a few hours to decide to leave al-Ghazaliyah, northwest of Baghdad, where he had lived for more than 20 years and to escape that same day with his wife and family, leaving behind all his possessions, only fearing the consequences if they failed to reach a safe haven before his escape was discovered. The family headed to the Shiite Sadr City, a location beyond the reach of his former al-Qaeda comrades, and lived there with the help of old friends.

According to Sumaya, the request to participate in an attack came totally out of the blue. “When the emir asked my husband to bring me with him, I thought that these people wanted to benefit from the nature of my work as a teacher in order to collect information on the area and its people but I was surprised to be the one chosen for the attack.”

Sumaya said that the “sister in jihad” told them that al-Qaeda wanted to quickly prepare for an attack. “I am obliged to choose the one who is most capable of hiding her load of ammunition.” After a test, she praised the way Sumaya walked carrying a heavy vest of stones and chose her for the task.

Fear prompted Sumaya to cry out. “But I am a mother of three children!” she exclaimed. It was then that the lady told her: “Do not worry about them, we will guarantee their future.”

Sumaya is only one among many female suicide bombers al-Qaeda has attempted to recruit to carry out attacks in Iraq, but one of the very few fortunate enough to escape. The process of recruiting female bombers began when Sajida al-Rishawi was recruited for a joint attack with her husband on a Jordanian hotel in 2005.

According to statistics from the Ministry of Interior 356 people were killed and injured in 16 suicide attacks carried out by women since the beginning of 2008. Another 34 attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda women during the last two years. According to information made available to Niqash, the majority of female suicide bombers are trained at a special female camp established by al-Qaeda in Diyala province.

In response, security and tribal authorities in Diyala have recently created a special women’s force specifically to combat female violence. Composed of 150 women trained by US forces, the unit, named the “Daughters of Diyala”, is similar to the armies of awakening councils. It aims to prevent further suicide attacks by al-Qaeda women in security turbulent Diyala province. Awakening councils in Baghdad also initiated a similar endeavor when 100 women volunteered to be trained by US female soldiers on detecting and combating female suicide bombers.

Government officials hope that these endeavors will contribute towards reducing the number of suicide attacks carried out by women. Adnan al-Asadi, undersecretary for the Iraqi interior minister, told Niqash that “security forces have recorded 79 attacks by women suicide bombers since the US entry into Iraq in April 2003.” He said that as emirs and leaders of armed cells have had to go into hiding following recent government security operations, more women have been recruited for attacks.

“The last two months have witnessed seven suicide bombings by women; three were carried out in one day targeting a group of Shiite visitors to the al-Karadah area in Baghdad and the latest was an attack by a 15-years-old girl. An investigation confirmed that the girl was intoxicated when she carried out the attack,” he said.

According to al-Asadi “al-Qaeda has succeeded in mobilizing women suffering from poverty and ignorance as well as widowed women to become suicide bombers. In some cases, belts containing explosive materials have been given to women in order to be delivered to certain people in return for a large sum of money. The explosives carried by these women were then detonated using a remote control device. Sometimes, street girls, not yet 18 years old, have been recruited.”

Yasin al-Azzawi, a social researcher, attributes the reason for women recruits to “the free mobility of women who do not undergo inspection by police and army checkpoints. Thus it is easier for them to carry out such attacks.”

Based on his research over the last two years, al-Azzawi notes that “there has been a big increase in the number of women joining terrorist groups following the relative success of awakening councils in defeating al-Qaeda.” He points out that “Islamist hardliners banned women from participating in jihad against the west before they changed their strategy. In al-Qaeda and Taliban military camps in Afghanistan, women were separated from their husbands and were asked to care for their children to allow men to dedicate their lives to jihad, but in Iraq a need for women’s participation was created when men’s activities became easily detected and hence women became an important factor in Islamic terrorism,” he said.

Views: 31


You need to be a member of to add comments!


Comment by Yigal D. Kahana on August 28, 2008 at 1:28am
I have... I did...
(I have a few interviews like that on video!)
Comment by Yigal D. Kahana on August 27, 2008 at 10:05pm
Take it easy, Sigal.
And please. Israel is so far from the worst nation on Earth.

I know some Darfurian Muslims living in Tel Aviv and Ashkelon who'll tell you
"Hamdullilah for Israel" with no hesitation at all.
Comment by Yigal D. Kahana on August 27, 2008 at 8:35pm
Sigal -
Just wondering.
How does Israel have ANY obligations under 242
when the PLO and PNC rejected it, formally, at least 3 times that I know of?

Isn't 242 simply irrelevant now?
Comment by Corey Gil-Shuster on August 27, 2008 at 7:45pm
Sigal, ahhh, you have touched on how conflicts work. You know when you are in a fight with a family member and the thing you are fighting about changes somehow (from you didn’t do the dishes to you never help out which quickly moves on to how your mother looked at me funny last time, etc.). Big conflict works in the same way. We believe we are fighting about something but the concepts, impressions, ideas, focus have all changed during the fight. And neither side notices.

Additionally, each side has a set of ideas about itself and the other which do not necessarily match if you compared them. So if we compared what you believe about Palestinian society to what they believe about their own society, it would not match. This creates a situation where each side screams at the other side, the other side doesn’t understand (because they are operating under a different set of ideas) and each is left with the impression that the other doesn’t want to find solutions. This is what we all do.

Another interesting aspect of conflicts is that we always end up mirroring each other. But find ways to show how we are completely different than the other side. To the outsider, we seem the same. Within the conflict we feel we are worlds apart (we are good, they are bad) which further fuels the conflict.

To illustrate all these aspects of conflict, I would point out that your stand that there is no occupation is as offensive to Palestinians as the word occupation is to you because to each group, the word has very different meaning. I would ask: is it worth creating a fight over a word? We could easily go in circles with no one ever convincing the other and without creating change. And all that for a word? Part of finding solutions is letting go of the small stuff- not everything has to be a stand that must be won. As my mother-in-law would say with a tisha b’av face- ma, lo chaval?

The only way to change the dynamics between us is to listen, to take notice that there are people on the other side who are listening as well (and there are and I can give you examples that changed my views) and for each of us to try to take responsibility when possible.
Comment by Neri Bar-On on August 27, 2008 at 6:04pm

If we think that the Jews have right to established a Jewish state here because they believe this is their land and they never leave it, why can we accept that other nations has such right of self determination?

The fact that our stories are connected and the territory has different nations who claim it explain the conflict, If you cannot see Hiba as Palestinian who live in Hevron, Occupied Palestine you may never meet any Palestinians because you ask them to accept your views and when you say There are a number of concerns that I have as regards peacemaker I advise you to read some of her posts and try to see it through her eyes and not just what frightens you. There are no many real people with wisdom and commitment for peace around here as Hiba.
Comment by Corey Gil-Shuster on August 27, 2008 at 5:59pm
Hi Sigal, Question for you: why does the term "occupation" offend you? I share much of your opinions but I don't find the term occupation threatending. What other word would you use for status of Palestinians in the West Bank?

In terms of the map. I understand your concern (if Palestinians always long for all of "Palestine" which includes today's Israel, will this conflict ever end). This is my take on the subject: just as every Jew I know feels deeply connected to the land of his/her ancestors, I must understand that Palestinians do as well. As much as that might be threatening to me (and really it is), I have to understand that they will also feel a connection to the same land I feel a connection to and the challenge is finding a way to make that work for both peoples. I would also point out that all Israeli maps I know also show the West Bank and Gaza as part of Israel but just like you, I am quick to be understanding of my own side (our ancestral homeland) and very quick to judge the other (they just want to take it away from us and throw us in the sea). I am sure that the Palestinians have the mirror image view of the symbolism of the land. We need to see that aspect of each other if we are ever to find solutions to this conflict.
Comment by Paul RETI on August 27, 2008 at 12:17pm
The violence in Iraq is not simple. Some just want the US out. Others are just jockeying for power in the power vacuum created by the ousting of Saddam. The US clearly understimated the complexity of Iraq's religious and ethnic issues.
Comment by Paul RETI on August 27, 2008 at 12:11pm

This started as and is a blog entry. The ning mechanism does not support threading of comments on blogs. The Forum discussions have limited threading.

We are all learning. Ideally this discussion should be made into a forum topic by someone for more readability. And all participants should try to stay on topic.
Comment by Paul RETI on August 27, 2008 at 12:04pm
This is a discussion about "sisters in jihad" and not Zionism
Comment by Paul RETI on August 27, 2008 at 11:59am
For a discussion of what Zionism is and is not, please see and contribute to the discussion FFF ::: Zionism which is at

Like Corey, I think that Zionism just a concept, which different people try to implement in different ways. The Wikipedia definition Roni cites above mainly focuses on the Modern Zionist movements.


Latest Activity

Amir Salameh updated their profile
Jun 25
Fredda Goldfarb updated their profile
Apr 15
Dr. David Leffler posted a blog post
Apr 9
Yousef Aburaiya posted a status
"im looking for friends at usa"
Feb 19
Yousef Aburaiya posted a status
"im looking for friends at usa"
Feb 19
Yousef Aburaiya posted a status
"im looking for friends at usa"
Feb 19
Yousef Aburaiya posted a status
"im looking for friends at usa"
Feb 19
Robert Roberts posted a blog post

All the core elements of an essay

Essays are very important in the life of students. Writing essays may be daunting in one way or the…See More
Feb 12


"Like" us on Facebook

Promote MEPEACE online



© 2019   Created by Eyal Raviv. Supported by One Region, One Future.   ..

Feedback | Report an Issue  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service